DHH Holds Second Forum on the Theory and Practice Regarding the Judicial Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights
To commemorate the 30th anniversary of the current constitution, and retrospectively examine the various quests for the judicialization of the constitution by legal professionals, DHH held the Second Forum on the Theory and Practice of the Judicial Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights at Qingdao Litian Hotel on January 20th, 2013.
The First Forum was held in 2003 by DHH. This year’s Forum was co-chaired by the Chief Editor Liu Guiming of the magazine Democracy and Rule by Lawand the Director of Beijing DHH Law Firm Mr. Jiang Qi. The Managing Director of Deheng Hu Ming and senior partner Yang Peiyang delivered speeches respectively on “Still on the way: looking back upon the 2003 Forum on the theory and practice of Judicial Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights” and “On-the-spot record: three students sue the Ministry of Education”.
In August of 2001 Shandong Deheng Law Firm represented three students, namely Luan Qian, Jiang Yan and Zhang Tianzhu, who sued the Ministry of Education for infringing their equal rights to education, as offered by the constitution, by specifying different admission scores for examinees in different provinces taking the same exam at the same time. This case was regarded as an ice-breaking move towards the judicialization of the constitution in China, and drew domestic and even international focus.
On January 11th, 2003 the (first) Forum on the Theory and Practice of Judicial Protection of Citizens’ Constitutional Rights was held in Qingdao,. It attracted many reputable constitutional experts, such as Huo Weifang, Han Dayuan, Jiao Hongchang, Liu Guiming, Li Shuzhong, Wang Lei, Si Li, Sun Xinqiang and Wei Yahua etc. They discussed the case from the perspective of the judicial protection of citizens’ constitutional rights. That case, and the discussion it raised, to some extent promoted the reform of the college admission system of China and some courts subsequently began to refer to constitution provisions in trials. The judicialization of the constitution of China had entered the ice-breaking stage.